By To raise Social Security’s retirement age or not — that is the question. During CNN’s recent debate, the two Republican presidential candidates expressed differing views on this critical matter.
Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, firmly stands against raising the retirement age for Social Security, at least for now. On the other hand, Nikki Haley, former South Carolina governor, believes that raising the retirement age is necessary for the benefit of younger constituents. She insists that while we must keep our promises to seniors, we cannot ignore the looming financial challenges.
The Social Security program is currently on a concerning path towards insolvency. Without intervention, it is projected that the trust funds supporting the program will run dry within a decade. This would result in monthly benefit cuts for beneficiaries. Historically, Congress has stepped in to prevent such a situation. However, lawmakers have yet to determine an effective solution to mend the program’s financial woes. Proposed measures include raising the retirement age, increasing taxes, eliminating the income cap for high-earning individuals, or a combination of these measures.
For individuals born in 1960 and later, the current Full Retirement Age (FRA) is set at 67. The FRA had last been raised in 1983, resulting in a 13% reduction in benefits. Moving the FRA from 67 to 70 — an idea that has gained traction in recent years — would effectively decrease currently scheduled benefits by nearly 20%, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Claiming Social Security benefits before reaching the FRA already results in permanently reduced benefits. Raising the retirement age could exacerbate these cuts further.
Unfortunately, lower- and middle-income individuals would be more adversely affected compared to their higher-earning counterparts. They rely more heavily on Social Security benefits and have not experienced the same increases in life expectancy as those with higher incomes, as highlighted by the CBPP.
The debate over the future of Social Security’s retirement age continues, with potentially significant implications for retirees and future beneficiaries alike.
Haley’s Proposal to Reform Social Security Program
Former governor Nikki Haley has once again put forward her pitch to reform the Social Security program. Haley’s proposal entails raising the retirement age for younger Americans, particularly those in their 20s. However, she emphasized that there would be no change for older Americans who are near the claiming age. During a recent event in New Hampshire, Haley assured that the program would remain the same for individuals in their 40s and beyond.
It is worth noting that Haley highlighted Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ previous voting record in support of increasing the retirement age for Social Security. DeSantis had voted for proposals that aimed at modifying eligibility criteria and changing full retirement ages for Medicare and Social Security during the early 2010s. However, DeSantis has since claimed that his stance on this matter has evolved.
During a recent debate, DeSantis voiced his opposition to any changes being made to the retirement age for Social Security at present. He pointed out that life expectancy in the United States is decreasing, rendering it inappropriate to raise the retirement age. Additionally, DeSantis argued that the cost of living, including expenses such as groceries and rent, is skyrocketing. He expressed his concern that the cost-of-living adjustment provided by Social Security falls short of covering these escalating costs. DeSantis emphasized that he is committed to preserving seniors’ benefits and would not disrupt them.
Responding to DeSantis’ claims, Haley contended that Florida is currently experiencing high levels of inflation. While she did not provide a specific answer regarding the new retirement age or whether workers in their 20s should plan to work until they’re 70, Haley emphasized that an increase in the retirement age should be anticipated.
“We must find a way out of this situation,” stated Haley during the debate. “We want to ensure that everyone receives the benefits they were promised, but we also want to guarantee that our children will have something when it is their turn to retire.”
Comments